Right to Life New Zealand

Upholding the sanctity of life in New Zealand and Standing Against the Killing

Andrew Little Seeks Removal of Stigma Associated with Killing Unborn Children

by Leave a Comment

Media Release 20 April 2019

The Minister of Justice, Andrew Little should be at the forefront in defending the right to life of every New Zealander from conception to natural death. Sadly he is not. Instead he is advocating not only for the killing of the defenceless unborn child as a “reproductive choice for women”, but also for the killing by doctors of the aged, the disabled and the seriously ill, through the End of Life Choice bill. He believes it’s all about ‘choice’.

Right to Life is disappointed that the Minister of Justice in a letter to our Society dated 11 April said, “the current framework around abortion is that it is a crime in the first instance. This attaches a heavy stigma to a woman who is considering an abortion …”

This stigma is a mark of disgrace that has been recognised by mankind since the beginning of time. This stigma is associated with the taking of innocent human life. It  is recognised internationally by all cultures and races. There is nothing the Minister can do to remove this stigma from the state funded and authorised genocide of our defenceless unborn which has killed more than 500,00 children since 1977. This stigma was instituted by God in support of His Fifth commandment, “Thou shalt not kill.”

To deny the stigma against taking innocent human life it is necessary to deny the humanity of the unborn child. Medical science tells us that human life begins at conception. Family Planning have warned against humanising the child in the womb and always uses language in describing the developing child, to achieve that goal.

It is the intention of the Labour led government to remove abortion from the Crimes Act and to make abortion a “reproductive choice for women.” The stigma is protective of women. The campaign to decriminalise abortion conducted by the government, is supported by the Family Planning Association.

The authors of previous genocides sought to remove the stigma associated with the murder of the innocent; the Turkish genocide of the Armenians, the Nazi genocide of the Jews, the genocide of the Cambodians by the Kymer Rouge and the Hutu genocide of the Tutsis in Rwanda. The government disguises the genocide by euphemistically calling it ‘health care’. To say that the government’s intention is to promote abortion as health care is akin to describing the gas chambers at Auschwitz as health spas.

The very foundational principle of our laws and medicine is the total prohibition on the taking of innocent human life. Abortion is the violent murder of an innocent child. Women instinctively want to protect the life of the child growing in their womb. The stigma resonnates with the conscience of women, which informs them that killing their child in the womb is always wrong.

The stigma is more intense for those women who have had an abortion especially those who have been coerced by the father of the child. Men who have fathered a child often threaten to abandon the mother or use violence against her, if she objects to having an abortion.

Those who seek to remove the stigma refuse to acknowledge that there are many women in our community who are suffering a lifetime of regret, grief and sorrow at the loss of their child in an abortion.


Right to Life requests the Minister  recognise that the killing of the unborn child is a crime against humanity and should be left in the Crimes Act. The government should promote adoption as the loving option.

Ken Orr
Spokesperson,
Right to Life

United Nations International Women’s Day – preventing violence against Women

by Leave a Comment

Media Release 8 M

Right to Life fully supports the International Women’s Day 8 March, to promote gender equality, and to oppose discrimination including violence against Women. We  commend the Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern for speaking out against violence against women. Violence against women and girls is an international problem of pandemic proportions. Violence against women is always a violation of human rights; it is always a crime and it as always unacceptable.

Right to Life asks the Prime Minister “how can you oppose violence against women and yet support the violence done in abortion against women and their precious unborn? How can you say you are opposed to violence against women and yet say that killing a woman in the womb is not a crime but a “reproductive health choice for women?”

Andrew Little on 27 October 2018 made the following comments on Newshub Nation, in response to concerns about the options put forward by the Law Commission. He said in regards to the potential lack of safeguards concerning sex-selection abortions, that women are “quite capable of making these judgements themselves. I don’t buy into this argument that we should start working through a checklist of potential things, reasons why women might seek an abortion.”

Right to Life believes that this statement by Little shows an appalling discrimination against women in the first nine months of their lives in the womb. What in effect he is saying, is that he believes gender should be a ground for abortion. We believe that the vast majority of New Zealanders would be shocked by a Miniser of Justice making such statements which may be construed as his support of sex selective abortion

The Police in New Zealand received over one hundred thousand in fact, 118,910 family violence calls to be exact, in 2017.  There were 13 women killed by their partner or ex partner in 2015. Violence against women takes many forms. It is disappointing that our community is in denial and refuses to recognise that abortion is violence against vulnerable women and their unborn child. An abortion entails an assault on the womb of a woman and a lethal assault on the life of her child.  Frequently it is because the father of the child wants the child killed because he refuses to accept responsibility for the child he has fathered, or for the care of the mother of his child. Nearly half of the children conceived yearly are female. What greater violence is there against women than to be killed in your mother’s womb?

It is thus disappointing that the government and Parliament actually continues to sanction and fund violence against women by financing the violence of abortion under the guise of health care. The government should not be surprised if New Zealand continues to be an increasingly violent society with the worst rate of family violence in the world

If we truly want to live in a society that respects women we must first protect mothers to be and their babies. The first step in achieving this is to ensure that our MP’s stand up against injustice and Jacinda Ardern’s attempts to decriminalise this awful and violent act.

Ken Orr
Spokesperson,
Right to Life New Zealand Inc.

Privacy Commissioner makes error of judgement

by Leave a Comment

John Edwards Privacy Commissioner
Right to Life believes that the Privacy Commissioner, John Edwards, has made a fundemental error of judgement in his submission to the law Commision by recommending that abortion be taken out of the Crimes Act and made a “reproductive choice for women.”
The Commissioner made the astounding claim that having abortion included under the Crimes Act was a breach of the privacy of the woman. His reasoning was that it exposed reproductive health information to the criminal justice system. This statement is simply absurd as no women has ever been or can be charged with crime when she has an abortion under the provisions of either the Crimes Act 1961, or the Contraception Steralisation and Abortion Act 1977.

In a media release dated 23rd November 2018 he stated, “Our submission stressed that abortion engages a fundamental right inherent in bodily autonomy and self-determination.” By declaring this he is effectively stating that Abortion is a human right. This is totally incorrect. Abortion is not and never will be a ‘fundemental right’.  He also states that “Abortion also engages informational privacy rights and the expectation of privacy and confidentiality in relation to health information”.

Right to Life challenges these false and unsupported statements. It is astounding that the Commissioner who is a reputable human rights lawyer has made a statement that Right to Life believes is not supported by any law in New Zealand or by any United Nations Convention. He is using the Privacy Act to make lies acceptable and murder respectable.

It is appalling that he does not recognise the unborn child’s inalienable right to its life  and its right to privacy in its mother’s womb, its home for the first nine months of its life. This right to life and privacy is provided by the Crimes Act sections 182 and 183.

The Commissioner supports the “bodily autonomy and self-determination” of the woman, but completely ignores the right to the bodily autonomy and self-determination of the unborn. The unborn child is a separate human being with its own body, its own blood supply and its own heart and bodily systems. We should behold this new unique miracle of God’s creation with profound awe and respect. From the moment of implantation, the unborn child who is in control of the pregnancy, is totally focused on its growth and development as it prepares for birth.

It is simply appalling that our learned Commissioner supports the right of abortionists to invade the privacy of the home of the defenceless unborn child for the purpose of violently killing the child by tearing off its head, arms and legs.

Right to Life believes that the Commissioner acted unlawfully and in fact is himself in breach of the Privacy Act 1993 and its twelve privacy principles by expressing support for the decriminalisation of abortion.

Right to Life encourages the Commissioner to accept the unborn child as the weakest and most defenceless member of the human family. As a renowned human rights lawyer we ask him to not use his office as an agent of execution but to provide a noble defence of the right to life of our precious unborn and for the welfare of their mothers.

Ken Orr
Spokesperson,
Right to Life

[Read more…]

Parliament’s Health Committee’s Report is a Road Map for a Culture of Death

by Leave a Comment

Parliament’s Health Committee, chaired by Dr Paul Hutchinson has released its report on its enquiry into “Improving Children’s Health Outcomes and Preventing Child Abuse. The introductory paragraph of the section of the report on the subject of “Pre-conception care and sexual and reproductive health” is a road map for a culture of death. The  report states,

“We recommend that the government develop a co-ordinated cross-sectoral action plan with the objective of giving New Zealand world-leading, best practice evidence- based sexuality and reproductive health education, contraception, sterilisation, termination, sexual health services, distributed to cover the whole country.”

Is this the New Zealand that we want to bequeath to our children?   I think not? Right to Life commends the Committee for a number of positive recommendations.  it is however concerned that an enquiry that was intended to prevent child abuse has recommendations that will increase child abuse. Right to Life must ask, was this section written by Family Planning? The recommendations are all in accordance with the plans that they have for our families and the phraseology was vintage Family Planning. The word ‘reproductive” appears an incredible forty -five times in this section. Reproductive is the word that Planned Parenthood and its population control allies in the United Nations and around the world claim include abortion services, which it does not. The recommendations of the Committee reflect those made by Family Planning they are:

  • In respect to abortion, that the Contraception Sterilisation and Abortion Act 1977 and the Crimes Act 1961 be reviewed.

  • That it be mandatory that all Schools teach sexuality education and reproductive health education programmes..

  • That parents  be prohibited from having their children taken out of sexuality and reproductive education classes.

  • Greater access to free contraceptives for teenagers, with the provision of long-acting reversible contraceptives.

Right to Life requests the government to uphold the right of schools to reject sexuality and reproductive health education programmes and the right of parents to take their children out of these classes.  Right to Life requests that the government provide abstinence school programmes, which promote self control and self respect. It would result in a reduction of unplanned pregnancies, STIs and abortions. The cost to the health budget is nil.

Abortion is the ultimate in child abuse. The Health Committee is recommending a review of the abortion law with the undisclosed motif of having abortion decriminalised, which is totally disingenuous. If the Health Committee were serious about reducing child abuse they would have recommended:

  • That the law recognise the status of the unborn child, the weakest and most defenceless member of the human family, as a human being endowed with human rights, the foundation right being an inalienable right to life. Predictably, but to their shame, the Family Planning Association requested  the Committee  to oppose recognising the unborn child as a human being and a person ”as this could erode women’s access to abortion.” Family Planning knows that if the unborn were recognised as human beings, then it would be uncomfortable to kill them.

  • The Committee should have called on Parliament to ensure that certifying consultants were held accountable for the lawfulness of the ninety-eight per cent of abortions authorised on the grounds of mental health. The Committee should be aware that these abortions are being authorised for socio- economic reasons masquerading as psychiatric.  

The Health Committee is failing the young people of New Zealand in believing that all our problems will be addressed by providing free contraceptives and making abortion more accessible, that is The killing of the innocent, more accessible. Abortionist and international contraception promoter Malcolm Potts [former director of Planned Parenthood of England] in 1976  quoted in ‘Sex and Social Engineering’ by Valerie Riches made the following statement. He said as people turn to contraception, there will be a rise, not a fall, in the abortion rate. The Committee’s recommendations would result in an increase in promiscuity, unplanned pregnancies, STIs and abortions. Right to Life requests the government to promote a culture of life by not  implementing the Health Committee’s recommendations in this area.

Ken Orr

Spokesperson,

Right to Life,

This is the website of Right to Life NZ Inc.
%d bloggers like this: