Right to Life New Zealand

Upholding the sanctity of Human life and Standing Up for the Vulnerable

Right to Life Calls on John Key to Reject Nomination of Rosemary Fenwicke, Abortionist, to Wellington Central Electorate

by Leave a Comment

9 April 2014

Right Honourable John Key,

Prime Minister,

Parliament Building,

Wellington.

Dear Mr Key

It is understood that Dr Rosemary Jane Fenwicke is seeking the nomination of the National Party for the Wellington Central electorate at the forthcoming general election.  I wish to draw your attention to the implications expected for the government should Dr Rosemary Fenwicke be selected.

 Dr Fenwicke, is a Certifying Consultant and an abortionist at the Te Mahoe abortion facility at the Wellington Hospital. This facility is the second busiest abortion mill in New Zealand. It reported 2,252 abortions in 2012. Dr Fenwicke has been working at this facility for many years and is responsible for the violent killing of many thousands of innocent and defenceless unborn children and promoting the war against women.

[Read more…]

Dr Rosemary Fenwicke, Abortionist, Candidate for Parliament

by Leave a Comment

Dr Fenwicke, is believed to be seeking the nomination of the National Party for the Wellington Electorate at the forthcoming general election, if she is successful,  it will have very serious national repercussions for the National Party.

The National Party is supported by many, as it is seen as the Party that is going to uphold the sanctity of life of every member of the community from conception to natural death, uphold traditional family values and promote social justice.

Dr Fenwicke is an abortionist, she is personally responsible for the killing of thousands of defenceless unborn children,  the blood of the innocent is on her hands. She has inflicted violence on vulnerable women, often exploited and abandoned by the father of their child. Dr Fenwicke does not help women by killing their children.

Dr Fenwicke, a member of Family Planning promotes a culture of death, with contraception, sterilisation and abortion. It would be outrageous and deeply offensive to hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders, that an abortionist should sit in our Parliament.

If  Dr Fenwicke is nominated as a Parliamentary candidate, our Society believes that there would be many thousands of voters who would refuse to vote for National, with the result that National could face defeat at the next election. Readers are encouraged to express their concern by writing to the Prime Minister,     john.key@parliament.govt.nz

Controversial Abortionist Seeks Seat In Parliament

by 2 Comments

 Media Release  3 April 2014

It is understood that Dr Rosemary Jane Fenwicke is seeking the nomination of the National Party for the Wellington Central electorate at the forthcoming general election.

Right to Life believes that should Dr Fenwicke be elected to Parliament, it would constitute a serious conflict of interest. The first duty of Parliament is to uphold effective legal protection for the right to life of every person from the moment of conception until natural death. The great American statesman Thomas Jefferson stated; “The care of human life and happiness and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government”.

The following constitute a considerable conflict of interest. Dr Fenwicke, is a Certifying Consultant and an abortionist at the Te Mahoe abortion facility at the Wellington Hospital. This facility is the second busiest abortion mill in New Zealand, that reported 2,252 abortions in 2012. Dr Fenwicke has been working at this facility for many years and is responsible for the violent killing of many thousands of innocent and defenceless unborn children and promoting the war against women.

Dr Fenwicke supports the decriminalisation of abortion that would remove all legal protection for the right to life of unborn children who are the weakest and most defenceless members of the human family. Decriminalisation would mean that an abortion could be performed during the full nine months of pregnancy, for any reason, or for no reason.

[Read more…]

Did North & South Magazine Really Misrepresent Abortionist Dr Simon Snook?

by Leave a Comment

The Ombudsman,

Wellington 6143.

Dear Sir

Complaint – Abortion Supervisory Committee

I wish to lodge a complaint against the Abortion Supervisory Committee for refusing to provide our Society with a copy of a letter received by the Committee from Dr Simon Snook dated 22 November 2013.  The Committee has declined our request under section 9[2] [ba] [i] to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence. I have enclosed for your information copies of the relevant correspondence.

In support of my complaint I wish to make the following submission.

I have serious reservations about the suspect defence now being offered by Dr Snook and accepted by the Committee.

Dr Snook has been appointed by the Abortion Supervisory Committee as a certifying consultant. He has a statutory duty to authorise abortions in accordance with the requirements of the Contraception Sterilisation and Abortion Act 1977 and with the Crimes Act 1961. He has thus been given the responsibility of deciding, which children shall live and which children will be killed.

A certifying consultant may only be appointed, if he or she provides a written declaration to the Committee that he or she does not hold views on abortion that do not comply with the legislation. A doctor, who believes that abortion is a woman’s choice, is precluded from appointment as a certifying consultant.

[Read more…]

Dr Simon Snook–Right to Life Believes this Doctor is a Disgrace to the New Zealand Medical Profession

by 1 Comment

17 September 2013

Secretary,

Abortion Supervisory Committee,

Dear Ms Anne Melkiau,

Dr Snook (pictured), Certifying Consultant – Abortion is about Choice

I wish to bring to your attention statements made by Dr Simon Snook in the October issue of the magazine North & South. Dr Simon Snook is a certifying consultant and an abortionist.

He is quoted as saying:

‘I have never met anyone who is flippant about doing a termination. But I don’t view an embryo or fetus as having the same rights as the person potentially having to raise it in the world. For me to have to say she is mentally unwell –or will be if the pregnancy continues-is a misnomer. This is about choice.”

The statement of Dr Snook is an affirmation of his belief that abortion is a matter for a woman to choose. The Crimes Act 1961 sets out in section 183, Procuring abortion by any means states that, everyone is liable to imprisonment for  a term not exceeding 14 years,  who with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman or girl, whether she is pregnant or not, unlawfully administers to her any poison or drug or uses an instrument to procure a  miscarriage. The killing of a child by abortion is thus a very serious crime. Abortions are however excused for serious and rare grounds set out under section 187A.

[Read more…]

Abortion on Trial in the US–What about New Zealand?

by Leave a Comment

Editor,

NZ Herald.

Dear Sir

Re 15 May. Kermit Gosnell the Philadelphia abortionist at the “house of horrors”  forces us to look at the underlying conundrum of a society that accepts abortion as a legitimate choice, thereby admitting that the unborn child has no right to life.  This gruesome case reminds us that the baby has a right to life  after it is born but before it is born it has no standing, why is this? An abortionist may force his way into a mother’s womb and dismember the child limb by limb to kill it and this is legal. The baby is the victim of choice and its killing is deemed to be legal. This case reminds us that in every abortion an innocent and defenceless child is killed. It reminds us too that abortion hurts women.  The Gosnell case raises the question are there unlawful abortions in New Zealand? Justice Miller stated in the High Court in Wellington in 2008 that, “there is reason to doubt the lawfulness of many abortions authorised by certifying consultants.”  We therefore have many children being denied their right to life. When are we going to see abortionists in New Zealand before the court charged with the unlawful killing of an unborn child?

[Read more…]

This is the website of Right to Life NZ Inc.