Right to Life New Zealand

Upholding the sanctity of Human life and Standing Up for the Vulnerable

IVF violates rights of human embryo – 15,000 New Zealand children stored and frozen!

by Leave a Comment

Media Release 20 November 2022

Right to Life makes no apology for speaking up in defence of the human rights of human embryos who are the weakest and most defenceless members of our human family.

 IVF and abortion are members of a culture of death which is supported and funded by the government of Jacinda Ardern under the guise of health care. They were also supported by the previous National government. 

The IVF procedure entails a massive disrespect for human life at its very beginning; it is a serious violation of human rights. Human life begins at the moment of conception. At conception every human being is endowed with an inalienable right to life. Each one of us began our life’s journey as an embryo.

The human embryo should be treated with the respect that is due to the human person. God, the author of life, has conferred on humans the surpassing ministry of safeguarding life, a ministry which must be fulfilled in a manner which is worthy of us. Therefore, from the moment of conception, life must be guarded with the greatest care.

  • Every child has a right to be conceived in the sanctuary of its mother’s womb.

It is a violation of human rights for medical professions to violate God’s plan for procreation by contriving to create new life in a petri dish.

  • Every child has a right not to be stored and frozen for up to 10 years.
  • Every child has the right not to be used for research, destroyed and then discarded as medical waste.

There are about 900 babies born each year in New Zealand as a result of IVF.

It is estimated that there are 15,000  human embryos, our brothers and sisters who are imprisoned in IVF clinics in New Zealand in cryopreservation, for up to 10 years, for possible future use,  after which they must be donated or destroyed. This is an appalling violation of human rights and a crime against humanity.

Right to Life is also opposed to using human embryos for research. There Is considerable pressure on the government to allow research on non-viable and “surplus” embryos from IVF.

Right to Life is committed to continue opposing IVF and this proposed unethical research.

 

Ken Orr,

Spokesperson,

Right to Life N.Z. Inc.

They want to copy you into an embryo and then carve you up

by Leave a Comment

In a scenario not to far removed from the  2005 American dystopian science fiction movie “The Island” an Israeli bio-tech company says it intends to create embryo-stage versions of people in order to harvest tissues for use in transplant treatments. Did you actually read that??
Well in less than twenty years, that dystopian future seems to have arrived. The company Renewal Bio plans to achieve this using advances in stem-cell technology and artificial wombs. The feasibility of creating such embryos without using sperm, eggs or even a uterus was the subject of a publication in the journal Cell early this week.
In who Right to Life would describe as a modern day Frankenstein, one Jacob Hanna, a biologist at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot has demonstrated that he has used mouse stem cells to form mouse embryos and kept them growing in mechanical wombs where he can cannibalise their developed hearts, flowing blood and cranial brain folds.
Renewal Bio, with Hannah’s help, is already working to develop this technology with human cells in the hope of creating artificial human embryos and growing them up to 50 days of pregnancy. (and why should he stop there?)
This is what an 8 week human being looks like! At that stage, hands, feet and all internal organs are in place.
“We view the embryo as the best 3D bio printer,” says Hanna. “It’s the best entity to make organs and proper tissue.”
Should we be surprised? Hasn’t man being playing God for a long time now? Aren’t we to some degree complicit with what is happening here. Haven’t the vast majority of the world’s Western population accepted a never before used form of ‘vaccine’ that incorporate the very building blocks of life, mRNA? We have trusted the people, the immunologists and micro-biologists who have built these technologies and believed them when they told us they were safe. But are they?
Should we be so trusting of the science? Is it not the scientists who are now actually in the process of creating some form of human life in these abominable experiments?
Are we going to sit by and allow these scientists to interfere with God’s creation?
Right to Life believes what is going on here is perhaps the greatest evil that mankind has ever devised. These people are creating human beings and for what? … For the purpose of cannabalising them to use their organs as body parts.
It does not matter how they spin it, this is evil.
They say they plan to use these human being embryos to; reboot elderly person’s immune systems.
They say that they plan to: grow embryonic copies of women with age related infertility, (kill them) and collect the embryo’s gonads which could be transplanted into a women’s body to produce youthful eggs.
It does not matter what so called ‘good’ may come out of this technology. This is totally evil from the outset and we must reject it utterly.
Do we really believe that God will allow this mockery of the pinnacle of his creation, the human being? No. Surely judgement will quickly follow for such evil.
We believe that those undertaking such abominations should be held to account.
What can you and I do in the face of such evil? One thing we can do is speak out. The company Bio Renewal has a website and you can email them. 

We can also express outrage to those who are funding this abomination. The venture firm NFX has provided the see capital for this evil. They state that their mission is “renewing humanity—making all of us young and healthy.”   PLEASE WRITE TO THEM AND TELL THEM WHAT YOU THINK.

While such abominations may not yet have come to New Zealand, we can be sure that it will not be long before those that can will try something similar here. Please keep your eyes and ears alert to signs that this may be occurring.
If this horror story gets to become real, what is to stop them ultimately growing fully grown cloned human bodies to use for spare parts?
Well they may think that they can stick the finger in God’s eye, but He will not be mocked.
Chris O’Brien
President Right to Life

Joe Biden Will Spend $88 Million This Year Funding Research With Aborted Baby Parts

by Leave a Comment

From LifeNews March 3rd 2022  If this man’s actions are not evil, what are?

Under the Biden administration, American taxpayers once again are being forced to fund scientific experiments using aborted baby body parts.

It is a major shift from the Trump administration, which cut off funding after undercover videos caught Planned Parenthood allegedly selling aborted baby body parts and conservative news outlets uncovered a study in which scientists implanted scalps from second-trimester aborted babies onto rodents.

The National Catholic Register reports the Biden administration allocated $88 million for human fetal tissue research in 2022 through the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Biden also disbanded an ethical review board to review funding requests, so now there is little oversight to ensure Americans’ tax dollars are being used ethically.

Father Tad Pacholczyk, the director of education and staff ethicist at the National Catholic Bioethics Center, told the Register that Biden quickly reversed course on fetal tissue research, and now is “returning us to the prior situation where fetal tissue research faced very few practical barriers or limitations.”

One particularly disturbing experiment that taxpayers funded through the University of Pittsburgh involved scalping second-trimester aborted babies and implanting their scalps onto rodents to study the human immune system. The information came from a study published in 2020 in the journal “Scientific Reports,” which included photos showing small tufts of baby hair growing on the rodents.

Last year, Judicial Watch and David Daleiden, founder of the Center for Medical Progress, which exposed Planned Parenthood’s involvement in aborted baby body parts harvesting, also uncovered evidence suggesting that some babies may be being born alive in abortions before their organs are harvested for scientific research at the University of Pittsburgh.

Speaking with the Register, Daleiden said American leaders need to be “loud and bold about these topics and keep talking about them and demanding answers from the government, Planned Parenthood and institutions like Pitt.”

A recent investigation commissioned by the University of Pittsburgh found no wrong-doing in the university scientists’ experiments with aborted baby body parts, but pro-life leaders criticized it for failing to examine important aspects of the research.

“The University of Pittsburgh lawyered up and tried to call it ‘transparency,’ yet refused to examine the actual abortion and organ-harvesting practices at its affiliated clinical locations like UPMC Magee and Planned Parenthood Western Pennsylvania,” Daleiden said.

“Planned Parenthood’s abortion providers are on staff at the University of Pittsburgh and perform abortions at UPMC to obtain the fetuses for the university’s experiments,” he explained to the Register. “Planned Parenthood Western Pennsylvania is a ‘contracted care site’ for the university, part of the university medical system. The so-called ‘regulatory assessment’ released by Pitt a few weeks ago in fact determined that Planned Parenthood abortion providers at UPMC routinely failed to document patient consent correctly — even to the point that some consent forms were not signed.”

Daleiden’s and others’ investigative work has raised very serious questions about the abortion industry, aborted baby body parts and scientific research, and as of yet, there are few answers. Yet, the Biden administration has charged ahead with re-instituting taxpayer funding for these unethical projects, many of them funded through Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Here’s more from the report:

A recent report from White Coat Waste, a group that opposes experimentation on animals, highlighted that the NIH plans to spend $88 million on human fetal-tissue research this year, with $27 million already approved for ongoing research. It detailed several experiments involving the transplanting of organs from aborted babies on to mice. In one such experiment at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, “mice were implanted with minced pieces of fetal bone marrow, liver and thymus to make their bodies mimic the human immune system — or, in the words of the experimenters, ‘BLT-humanized mice.’”

Another experiment involved “implanting two pieces of human fetal lung tissue (Advanced Bioscience Resources) subcutaneously into the back” of the mice.

The Trump administration began to crack down on this funding in response to pro-lifers’ concerns. It canceled several contracts, including one involving “humanized mice,” and took other steps to stop funding unethical research, including through the formation of the new advisory board.

Trump also established a bioethics advisory board that recommended that the government reject grants for 13 research projects that plan to use aborted baby body parts. Trump appointed a number of leading pro-life researchers and bioethicists to the board, but Biden later disbanded it.

The Trump administration also invested $20 million into promoting ethical alternatives to aborted baby parts in scientific research.

Within the first 100 days of taking office, however, President Joe Biden’s administration reversed these pro-life actions. Now, Americans’ tax dollars are being used again to fund gristly experiments, such as implanting aborted babies’ scalps and fingers onto mice for scientists to study.

 

Joe Biden Will Spend $88 Million This Year Funding Research With Aborted Baby Parts

Government vaccine mandates of Police and Defence Force unlawful

by Leave a Comment

Media Release 26 February 2022

Right to Life welcomes the brilliant judgement of Justice Francis Cooke in the High Court on the lawfulness of the vaccine mandate imposed by the government on members of the Police force and the Defence force.

 The community is indebted to these courageous citizens who brought this important conscience issue to the High Court.

The judgement is a victory for the supremacy of the conscience of the individual over the dictates of a controlling state. It upholds the human right of the appellants to exercise their conscience in refusing the demand of the government to subject their bodies to a medical procedure, specifically, the experimental Pfizer gene therapy.

Right to Life believes that this judgement gives support and encouragement to the thousands of hard working doctors, nurses, health care workers, teachers and other New Zealanders who have been cruelly deprived of their profession and work because they refused the demand of the government to accept the Pfizer vaccine.

Never before in the history of New Zealand has the right to work been subject to our vaccination status.

Justice Cooke accepted the appellants’ claim that the government mandate violated their human rights guaranteed by the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990, the right to refuse a medical treatment and the right to manifest religious beliefs.

The appellants recognised and argued that the Pfizer “vaccine’ had been tested with the cell line HEK 293 which was unethically produced from a baby killed in a late term abortion performed by caesarean section. The baby, while still alive and without an anaesthetic, had its kidney painfully removed to be used to produce a cell line. This was an appalling violation of the right to life of the child and a crime against humanity.

Right to Life requests that the government accepts the just judgement of Justice Cooke and now revoke vaccination mandates and restore employment to the thousands of New Zealanders deprived of their work through the punitive and damaging mandates.

The government knew, when it purchased the Pfizer and other vaccines, that they had been produced or tested with cell lines from aborted babies. Right to Life again requests that the government purchase only vaccines that have been ethically produced and tested without the use of cell lines derived from babies killed in abortions.

Ken Orr,

Spokesperson,

Right to Life N.Z. Inc.

Why are our church leaders silent when our human rights are under attack from the state?

by 1 Comment

Media Release 8 December 2021

Right to Life believes that our spiritual leaders have a serious duty to speak up in defence of our human rights when they are being violated by the State.

Right to Life therefore asks why are our religious leaders remaining silent, when thousands of New Zealanders have been callously deprived of their right to work, because they refused to violate their conscience by allowing the state to vaccinate them against Covid-19?

The government considers that our freedom is a privilege to be granted by the state. It is also violating our freedom and human rights by imposing on the community vaccination passports that have created a segregated society.

Those with a passport are first class citizens granted full freedom and are to be protected from those who are unvaccinated, who are granted second class citizenship with severely restricted freedoms.

Right to Life supports voluntary vaccination, with ethically produced and developed vaccines, which are safe and effective. The long term adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine are not known as the study does not conclude till January 2023.

The Pfizer vaccine is not a proper vaccine, as it is an experimental gene therapy medical treatment. Pfizer is indemnified from accepting legal responsibility for any adverse reaction that might result from taking their “vaccine.”

Right to Life believes that our civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure. Every New Zealander should reject allowing the government to decide what medical procedures they must engage in to remain in employment.

On 20th September 2020 Jacinda Ardern was quoted as saying “Not only will there be no forced vaccinations, but those who choose to opt-out won’t face any penalties at all”.

 Protecting and safeguarding individual rights demands constant legal, social, and political struggle against government censorship, coercion, and mandates.

Right to Life questions why persons who refuse to take this experimental medical treatment are being treated as a serious public health threat, when those who are vaccinated are just as likely to carry and spread Covid virus as the unvaccinated.

Mandatory vaccinations violate the Nuremburg Convention, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, which protects the right to life, the right to refuse medical treatment, and the right to practice one’s religion.

The Human Rights Act 1993 includes the right not to be discriminated against. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights protects the right to privacy.

Right to Life asks: “Why we should trust the government to protect the lives and health of the community when it authorises and funds the killing of more than 13,000 defenceless unborn New Zealanders every year” and is now funding the killing of the seriously ill in the community with assisted suicide and euthanasia?

Right to Life supports voluntary vaccination with ethically produced and developed vaccines which are safe and effective.  Right to Life requests that our spiritual leaders speak up urgently in defence of our human rights, currently under threat from a dictatorial government.

Ken Orr,

Spokesperson,

Right to Life N.Z. Inc.

Will the right to die become the duty to die?

by 2 Comments

 Media Release 7 November 2021

The 7th November is a day that will go down in our nation’s history as a day of shame, the day when our Parliament defied the fifth commandment, “Thou shalt not kill” and rejected the authority and supremacy of God the Creator and author of life. Parliament has now appointed itself as the supreme authority with the right to decide who shall live and who shall die.

We all desire a dignified death, however there is no dignity in being killed by your doctor under the pretext that this is health care. 

Right to Life is committed to the repeal of the End of Life Choice Act 2019. We will oppose its implementation and expose the threat that it imposes on patients, families and medical practitioners. We will not rest until this evil legislation is repealed.

 Parliament rejected its responsibility to uphold the sanctity of life of every human being from conception to natural death. It has also violated the ethics of the medical profession by demanding that medical professionals participate in the killing of their patients or assisting in their suicide.

The government fully supports this appalling legislation as they are aware that it is more economic to kill than to provide care for patients. The funding of the killing of patients is a health priority for the Public Health system. Privately employed doctors and nurse practitioners will be able to claim a generous government funded fee for each patient killed.

Right to Life asks the Minister of Health, Andrew Little, why is the government paying a generous fee to doctors to kill patients but provides no fees to doctors who offer life-saving palliative care?

An attending medical or nurse practitioner can claim $1087.20 for killing their patient by euthanasia, or assisting them in their suicide.

In addition to the above fee, attending medical practitioners can claim $724.80 for responding to a patient’s request, completing the paperwork, giving the first opinion, and referring for a second opinion, or for a psychiatrist’s report.  If these requirements take more than three hours, the fee can escalate to $1208.A further $362.40 may be claimed by the attending medical practitioner when they deliver the news as to the person’s eligibility and put in place the next steps such as support services, paperwork, and if eligible, arranging the time and date of death. The independent medical practitioner who gives a second opinion can claim $604.00.

Psychiatrists who determine the competency of the person requesting euthanasia or assisted suicide, and who advises the medical practitioners if the person is eligible may claim $1544.16.

Further, if the medical or nurse practitioner or a psychiatrist needs to travel to the patient, they may claim expenses, and charge an hourly rate for the time.  The hourly rate is $120.80 for medical and nurse practitioners and $193.02 for psychiatrists. Altogether, an attending medical practitioner who is part of the process from start to finish, may claim more than $2,000.00 in fees.  If the initial consultations and paperwork take longer than 3 hours to complete, this fee could escalate to more than $3,000.00.

Funding is not available to doctors who participate in the killing of patients as an employee of a District Health Board. The Minister is anxious that the killing of patients be done discreetly, not in a hospital but in the patient’s own home or retirement home.

The End of Life Choice Act is but the first step in the killing of the vulnerable.

Following overseas experience, we may expect the law to be expanded to include the non-terminally ill, those with advance directives, the disabled, the mentally ill, those with Alzheimers and dementia and possibly to children. The right to die may become a duty to die.

Ken Orr,

Spokesperson,

Right to Life N.Z. Inc.

Vaccinate or starve?

by Leave a Comment

Media Release 31 October 2021

The actions of the Labour government are an increasing threat to the human rights of New Zealanders. It is the duty of the state to protect the human rights of all New Zealanders from conception to natural death.

 Right to Life is disappointed that that the churches, who should be at the forefront in defending the human rights of New Zealanders, are silent on these matters.

The Catholic Church has a distinguished record in defending the rights of workers. The Papal encyclical Rerum Novarum of 1891, encapsulates the Church teaching on the rights of workers, the duties of employers and duty of the State to care for workers.

Right to Life believes that the Churches have a duty to speak up in defence of workers threatened with unemployment for following their conscience.

The government, under cover of the Covid 19 pandemic, pushed through the Abortion Legislation Act in March 2020 with urgency, thereby denying the human rights of the unborn by inflicting abortion, literally on demand up to birth.

The government has also denied the human rights of the seriously ill and the dying by its overwhelming support for the End of Life Choice Act 2019, which will be inflicted on our nation on 7th November. This diabolical legislation will allow doctors to give their patients a lethal injection or assist in their suicide, under the guise of health care.

Still under the guise of health care, the government is threatening the human rights of New Zealanders if they disobey the government directive to accept the experimental Pfizer “vaccine” and become part of the international research group to ascertain the long term adverse reactions to this vaccine, this is phase 3 which has just started and will conclude in January 2023.

The government have now resolved to increase the number in the work force subject to mandatory vaccination to about 40%. This includes those employed in hospitality, hairdressers and gyms, who are now required by the government to accept the Pfizer vaccine experimental gene therapy medical treatment, or lose their employment.

New Zealanders have a right to work to provide for themselves and their family. This right is enshrined in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights Article 23, “Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment to just and favourable conditions and protection against unemployment”.

The NZ Labour Party has a proud record of defending the rights of workers, the 40 hour week and full employment. It is simply unbelievable that we have a Labour government that is threatening the employment of tens of thousands of New Zealanders over this issue.

Michael Joseph Savage, the former Labour leader, whose photo sits strategically in the Prime Minister’s office would turn in his grave if he could see what the sixth Labour government is doing to undermine the traditional family, reject the sanctity of life and trample over the human rights of New Zealanders.

This vaccination mandate contravenes the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, section 10, which reads

”Right not to be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation

Every person has the right not to be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation without that person’s consent.”

Section11, reads, “Right to refuse to undergo medical treatment Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment.”

Why is the government choosing to ignore this important legislation which was enacted to protect our human rights?

Ken Orr,

Spokesperson,

Right to Life N.Z. Inc.

Mandatory Vaccinations Violate Human Rights

by 4 Comments

Media Release 24 October 2021

It is an appalling injustice that the state should threaten tens of thousands of workers in New Zealand with the loss of their employment and income to feed and provide for their families if they refuse an order to violate their conscience by taking the Pfizer vaccine. 

Right to Life believes that the government of Jacinda Ardern is threatening the human rights of New Zealanders by declaring that health workers and those employed in education have a duty to be vaccinated in order to retain their employment. This includes general practitioners, chemists, midwives, paramedics and rest home staff. It includes primary, secondary teachers and pre -school staff. Who will be next?

The government has decided that these important professionals are a serious threat to public health if they exercise their legal right to choose not to accept the Pfizer vaccine.

Right to Life questions why persons who refuse to take this experimental medical treatment being treated as a serious public health threat when those who are vaccinated are just as likely to carry and spread Covid as the unvaccinated.

On 20th September 2020 Jacinda Ardern was quoted as saying “Not only will there be no forced vaccinations, but those who choose to opt-out won’t face any penalties at all”.

The PM, Jacinda Ardern, before the election in 2020 was asked by Duncan Garner on the AM show  “was the government going to apply penalties to those who refused to take the Covid 19 vaccine?”.

She said, “no and we haven’t for any vaccine in New Zealand, applied penalties in that way”.

Mandatory vaccinations violate the Nuremburg Convention, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, which protects the right to life, the right to refuse medical treatment, and the right to practice one’s religion. The Human Rights Act 1993 includes the right not to be discriminated against. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights protects the right to privacy.

 Right to Life accepts that the government has a responsibility to protect public health and asks,” why we should trust the government to protect the lives and health of the community when it authorises and funds the killing of more than 13,000 defenceless unborn New Zealanders every year”.

Right to Life supports voluntary vaccination with ethically produced and developed vaccines which are safe and effective. The long term adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine are not known as the study does not conclude till January 2023.

Right to Life cannot support this government’s contention that the seriousness of the current pandemic overrides these concerns. We believe that recent evidence shows that those taking an mRNA “vaccine” are potentially permanently altering their body’s immune system in ways which are not fully tested, researched or understood.

We believe that recent evidence shows that those take the mRNA vaccine may be permanently altering their body’s immune system.

Right to Life is therefore disappointed that the government is giving no choice to choose an ethically produced and tested vaccine. We are therefore opposed to mandatory vaccination for the following reasons:-

  • Mandatory vaccination is a violation of human rights.
  • The state is ignoring the conscience of many in the community who are opposed to accepting the Pfizer vaccine, therefore taking it is a violation of their conscience, as it has been tested using a cell line derived from aborted babies.
  • The benefits of the Pfizer vaccine do not justify the state imposing the mandatory vaccination on a sector of the workforce. According to data published in the Lancet, the effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine in combatting the Delta variant, diminishes rapidly over time. After six months of full vaccination it diminishes in effectiveness from 88% to only 65%.
  • The government wishes to establish safe areas free of Covid 19 by excluding the unvaccinated, this ignores the fact that the vaccinated may carry the virus and spread it to others.

Ken Orr,

Spokesperson,

Right to Life NZ Inc.

Vaccination Passports Opposed

by 2 Comments

Media Release 21 September 20201

Right to Life believes that we should be opposed to the government introducing a vaccination passport.

Such a move would be medical apartheid, discriminatory, a violation of our human rights and an instrument that the government could use to reward those who support the government’s vaccination programme and to punish those who refuse vaccination, they would become second class citizens.

The Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern has publicly stated that she does not support a vaccination passport, however her recent veiled threat made to the leaders of faith communities suggests that this would be a measure that she could use to achieve the compliance of faith communities with her vaccination programme.

The Prime Minister on Radio NZ on the 9th September warned:

“If you are a (vaccinated) faith leader who wants your congregation to continue to be able to worship together you can help support and enable that to happen by getting (supporting) your congregation to be vaccinated as well”.

The message to the faith communities is, those who are not vaccinated will be forbidden to pray and worship with those who are vaccinated.  To implement this segregation it will be necessary to issue the vaccinated with a vaccination passport.

Right to Life believes that Vaccination passports actually protect nobody. Those who are vaccinated have no guarantee that they don’t have the virus to give to others including the vaccinated. It therefore does not make you safer to know everyone else is vaccinated.

There are many countries that have already instituted vaccination passports. Israel sets the standard with its Green pass introduced on 21 February 2021, it was later withdrawn in June then reintroduced for six months on 29 July 2021. It imposes restrictions on the unvaccinated prohibiting their attendance at  theatres, malls, churches, synagogues, gyms, hotels, restaurants and Universities. The unvaccinated may only attend university on line. Secondary students sitting matriculation are required to be vaccinated. These are severe restrictions of civil liberties that have been vigorously opposed by many Israelites.

Right to Life encourages the community to resist any restrictions on our civil liberties that would be imposed on us by the government seeking to introduce a vaccination passport under the guise of promoting public health.

Ken Orr,

Spokesperson,

Right to Life

Jacinda Ardern’s warning threatens religious freedom

by 1 Comment

Media Release 16 September 2021

 Right to Life is concerned that the Prime Minister is threatening our community to  make it a legal offence for an unvaccinated worshipper to enter a church and join a congregation to worship God.

 The Prime Minister, on Radio NZ on 9th September warned, “If you are a faith leader who wants your congregation to continue to be able to worship together you can help support and enable that to happen by getting your congregation to be vaccinated as well”. 

This is a blatant attempt to coerce members of faith communities to submit to vaccination with the experimental gene serum, with the long term adverse reactions unknown, due to long term studies having not been conducted, in order to be allowed to continue as a congregation.

Freedom of religion is a human right upheld by the UN Declaration of Human Rights, Article 18 Everyone has the right of freedom of thought, conscience and religion.

Also the UN Declaration on the Elimination of all Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief.

The NZ Bill of Rights, section 13  Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion also upholds our right of freedom of religion.

Right to Life believes that every member of a faith community has an inalienable right to join with others in giving praise and worship to our Creator.

  • The government has a duty to protect our right to freedom of worship.
  • It would be a serious violation of human rights for the state to require that those wishing to worship their Creator with a congregation must first be vaccinated and receive a vacation passport before being given permission from the government to enter a church.
  • This is potentially tyrannical and is the action expected from a police state.
  • This is discrimination, inequality and coercion against religious communities.
  • The state could then have a record of every person who was a member of a faith community.

Is the government intending to follow the example of the Chinese Communist Party and require that every believer, who would be seen as a potential threat to the state, be registered with the state?

Right to Life believes that the community should awake to this pending darkness and vigorously oppose this proposal, while we are still free to do so, of the totalitarian control of what we think, what we say, where we go and where we may worship.

Right to Life also believes that we should heed the warning of former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer Dr. Michael Yeadon who in 2020  issued a dire warning to the world regarding vaccination programs and related political measures, arguing that it is likely designed to bring about “utterly totalitarian control of the entire population forever.”

Ken Orr,

Spokesperson,

Right to Life

This is the website of Right to Life NZ Inc.
%d bloggers like this: