It has taken them 35 years to get to this point, and we have to be as patient and as diligent as they were. The unborn child still has a moral right to life and we must work to restore that in law.
As I said in my Sunday Times column:
“It remains as much the case today as it was on Friday that the unborn child has a moral right to life; that it is one of us. If the referendum vote had been 99-1 in favour of repeal, that would still be so. The law acknowledges the fundamental rights that are ours by virtue of being human, but it does not create them. The law may fail to acknowledge and protect your rights, but they still exist, morally speaking. The size of a vote has absolutely no effect on this. It then becomes a matter of fighting to have your rights acknowledged in law once more.”
(You can find the column here).
We now live in a society that values choice and “personal freedom” above all else. We are horrified at unchosen burdens and we have now created a legal right to eliminate the unwanted unborn. It is inevitable that we will now try to do the same to the old and infirm who have come to believe they are also burdensome.
No moral consensus lasts forever. This one will likely last for several decades, and we must be the ones who have the courage and perseverance to dissent from it and be the voice that says we must help those with burdens instead of ending the lives of the ‘burdensome’. That is the only humane and acceptable response.
We must continue to advocate for the right to life of the unborn as the pro-life movement has done, and is doing, in other countries. We must learn from them to be patient, confident that at some point in the future the law will once again protect the unborn members of the human family.
We own our unborn fellow human beings nothing less.
David Quinn is the director of the Iona Institute. The above is adapted from a press release of the Institute.