Media Release 16th April 2014
Right to Life asks why a doctor who has committed a serious crime has not been brought before the Court?
The doctor called Dr N was found guilty of professional misconduct by the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal for breaches of the Contraception Sterilisation and Abortion Act 1977, and for prescribing the drug Misoprostol unlawfully to four women for the purpose of terminating the lives of their unborn children. The drug acts by causing uterine contractions resulting in the death of the child in the womb. Doctor N has been granted permanent name suppression by the High Court.
The Tribunal suspended Dr N from practicing for six months last year and imposed a number of other requirements concerning the conduct of her practice. The Tribunal found that the doctor had acted unlawfully in breach of the Contraception Sterilisation Act 1977. The Act requires that abortions may be authorised by two certifying consultants appointed by the Abortion Supervisory Committee and that pregnancy counselling be available and offered. The law also requires that abortions take place only in a facility licensed to perform abortions. These requirements are there to protect the health and welfare of women and to protect the right to life of unborn children.
Continue reading Doctor Who Procured Four Abortions Acted Unlawfully – Justice Has Not Been done?
Media Release 15th April 2014
Right to Life commends the courageous defenders of life who gather each Friday outside the Thames Hospital. They give witness to the sanctity of life of the unborn, who are being brought to the Hospital to have their lives violently terminated. They also pray for the mothers who are the second victims of abortion and for the hospital staff, that they will follow their conscience and refuse to have the blood of the innocent on their hands.
It is disappointing that Jacquie Mitchell (pictured), the manager of the Thames Hospital accuses those giving witness of harassment and claims that “the abortions are being performed for the right reasons.” There were 407 children who were killed at the Thames Hospital in 2012. There are no good and right reasons for killing a child before it is born. Those who engage in peaceful, prayerful vigils are exercising their right to free speech and assembly; this is not harassment. The manager is trying to create an aura of normality around abortion as though it is a normal and an acceptable part of our health service. It is not; it is violence against women and fatal violence against their precious unborn. Abortion has no place in our health service and it has no place in the Thames Hospital. Abortion is the only procedure where two patients enter a hospital and only one comes out.
Continue reading Waikato District Health Board Defends Violence Against Women and the Killing of the Unborn
10 April 2014
Mr Nigel Latta
Goldfish Wisdom Ltd..
Dear Mr Latta
Association of Abortion and Child Abuse
I wrote to you on 26 November 2012, concerning the link between abortion and child abuse. Having not received a reply I wrote to you again on 15 April 2013. It is nearly fifteen months since I first wrote to you. I appreciate that you are very busy with your business, however it is extremely disappointing that you have not seen fit to respond to my correspondence.
Child abuse is a burden on the conscience of the nation. Right to Life is totally opposed to child abuse and we will continue to work to alert our community into the link between abortion and child abuse, for the killing of the child in the womb is the ultimate child abuse.
Continue reading Nigel Latta Asked to Join the Dots Connecting Child Abuse and Abortion
9 April 2014
Right Honourable John Key,
Dear Mr Key
It is understood that Dr Rosemary Jane Fenwicke is seeking the nomination of the National Party for the Wellington Central electorate at the forthcoming general election. I wish to draw your attention to the implications expected for the government should Dr Rosemary Fenwicke be selected.
Dr Fenwicke, is a Certifying Consultant and an abortionist at the Te Mahoe abortion facility at the Wellington Hospital. This facility is the second busiest abortion mill in New Zealand. It reported 2,252 abortions in 2012. Dr Fenwicke has been working at this facility for many years and is responsible for the violent killing of many thousands of innocent and defenceless unborn children and promoting the war against women.
Continue reading Right to Life Calls on John Key to Reject Nomination of Rosemary Fenwicke, Abortionist, to Wellington Central Electorate
Dr Fenwicke, is believed to be seeking the nomination of the National Party for the Wellington Electorate at the forthcoming general election, if she is successful, it will have very serious national repercussions for the National Party.
The National Party is supported by many, as it is seen as the Party that is going to uphold the sanctity of life of every member of the community from conception to natural death, uphold traditional family values and promote social justice.
Dr Fenwicke is an abortionist, she is personally responsible for the killing of thousands of defenceless unborn children, the blood of the innocent is on her hands. She has inflicted violence on vulnerable women, often exploited and abandoned by the father of their child. Dr Fenwicke does not help women by killing their children.
Dr Fenwicke, a member of Family Planning promotes a culture of death, with contraception, sterilisation and abortion. It would be outrageous and deeply offensive to hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders, that an abortionist should sit in our Parliament.
If Dr Fenwicke is nominated as a Parliamentary candidate, our Society believes that there would be many thousands of voters who would refuse to vote for National, with the result that National could face defeat at the next election. Readers are encouraged to express their concern by writing to the Prime Minister, firstname.lastname@example.org
Michael Cook of MercatorNet posts this very relevant and important post. The article exposes the real tragedy behind same sex marriage.
A bioethics expert argues that laws ensuring that every child knows its mother and father are unethical.
Britain’s first same-sex marriages will take place this coming weekend. In May Sir Elton John and his partner David Furnish plan to exchange vows, making them spouses as well as parents to their two sons, Zachary and Elijah. Jubilant campaigners say that fears of an impending social calamity are nonsense.
In The Conversation, a law lecturer at Cardiff University, Leanne Smith, comments: “Ultimately, no institutions, religions, lifestyles or individuals have been harmed … The advent of gay marriage changes virtually nothing – but by validating gay relationships, it will transform lives and spread happiness.”
But something has changed: Elijah and Zachary do not know which of the two men is their father and they do not know who their mother is. The California birth certificates list Sir Elton as the legal father and Furnish as the legal mother. The biological mother and the surrogate mother may or may not be the same person, but they have been excluded from the boys’ lives.
To read the full article at MercatorNet click here
Media Release 3 April 2014
It is understood that Dr Rosemary Jane Fenwicke is seeking the nomination of the National Party for the Wellington Central electorate at the forthcoming general election.
Right to Life believes that should Dr Fenwicke be elected to Parliament, it would constitute a serious conflict of interest. The first duty of Parliament is to uphold effective legal protection for the right to life of every person from the moment of conception until natural death. The great American statesman Thomas Jefferson stated; “The care of human life and happiness and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government”.
The following constitute a considerable conflict of interest. Dr Fenwicke, is a Certifying Consultant and an abortionist at the Te Mahoe abortion facility at the Wellington Hospital. This facility is the second busiest abortion mill in New Zealand, that reported 2,252 abortions in 2012. Dr Fenwicke has been working at this facility for many years and is responsible for the violent killing of many thousands of innocent and defenceless unborn children and promoting the war against women.
Dr Fenwicke supports the decriminalisation of abortion that would remove all legal protection for the right to life of unborn children who are the weakest and most defenceless members of the human family. Decriminalisation would mean that an abortion could be performed during the full nine months of pregnancy, for any reason, or for no reason.
Continue reading Controversial Abortionist Seeks Seat In Parliament
Complaint – Abortion Supervisory Committee
I wish to lodge a complaint against the Abortion Supervisory Committee for refusing to provide our Society with a copy of a letter received by the Committee from Dr Simon Snook dated 22 November 2013. The Committee has declined our request under section 9 [ba] [i] to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence. I have enclosed for your information copies of the relevant correspondence.
In support of my complaint I wish to make the following submission.
I have serious reservations about the suspect defence now being offered by Dr Snook and accepted by the Committee.
Dr Snook has been appointed by the Abortion Supervisory Committee as a certifying consultant. He has a statutory duty to authorise abortions in accordance with the requirements of the Contraception Sterilisation and Abortion Act 1977 and with the Crimes Act 1961. He has thus been given the responsibility of deciding, which children shall live and which children will be killed.
A certifying consultant may only be appointed, if he or she provides a written declaration to the Committee that he or she does not hold views on abortion that do not comply with the legislation. A doctor, who believes that abortion is a woman’s choice, is precluded from appointment as a certifying consultant.
Continue reading Did North & South Magazine Really Misrepresent Abortionist Dr Simon Snook?
Media Release 30 March 2014
The human remains of more than 15,000 unborn children who had been murdered in their mother’s wombs were used to heat hospitals in the United Kingdom; this expose was made following an investigation by a television channel and resulted in an immediate ban by the Minister of Health, Dr Dan Poulter who described this practice as “totally unacceptable.”Why is it unacceptable, if society accepts the murder of the unborn, why is the incineration of their bodies unacceptable? This appalling disrespect for unborn children is reminiscent of the Nazi concentration camps like Auschwitz where the bodies of the murdered prisoners were incinerated in large ovens to implement the “final solution for the Jewish problem.”Today our hospitals implement a similar final solution programme of the murder and extermination of “unwanted unborn children.” Continue reading Thousands of Aborted Unborn Children Incinerated as Human Waste in UK to Heat Hospitals
Media Release 26th March 2014
The Abortion Law Reform Association in an open letter to abortionists, admires the bravery of abortionists for providing abortion services, “frequently done at a cost to your own safety and wellbeing, We honour your bravery; bearing the brunt of anti-choice bullying, threats and spurious attempts to make clinic/ medical providers into villains.” “You are the unsung heroes of the medical profession.”
In the Machiavellian world of ALRANZ evil becomes virtue and virtue becomes evil. Pregnancy is not a disease and the killing of the unborn is not a health service. There is nothing heroic or brave for a doctor to exercise his medical skills to invade with deadly murderous intent, the mother’s womb, the sanctuary of the child, where the child terrified at the intrusion, heart racing in terror and mouth open in a silent scream frantically tries to avoid the curette which seeks to tear the limbs of the child from its body.
It is ironic that ALRANZ condemns defenders of life praying outside abortion clinics for the conversion of abortionists and the welfare of mothers and their unborn as bullying and threatening to abortionists. This is a distraction from the real violence perpetrated against vulnerable women and their unborn inside the clinic.
Right to Life believes that these doctors are motivated by true concern for the health and welfare of a woman facing an unplanned pregnancy; they are however sadly mistaken in believing that they can solve a woman’s problem by killing their children. They are not the “unsung heroes” of the medical profession but have sadly become serial killers and a disgrace to the medical profession.
Continue reading Abortion Law Reform Association Praises Heroic Abortionists